How We Rate Casinos
Our reviews are documentation-based. We assess every operator from its published terms and conditions, bonus rules, payout policies and licence records, cross-checked against the operator's live website — and we do not claim first-hand play testing unless it actually took place.
Last updated: August 2026
Licence verification
Every licence is checked against the regulator's public register, not the operator's own claim. If we cannot confirm a licence in the register, the review says so.
Terms and bonus analysis
We read the full terms and conditions and bonus rules: wagering requirements, win caps, maximum bet, game weighting and expiry. Where marketing promises contradict the operator's own terms, the review calls it out — the binding document wins.
Payout windows
The payout times we show are the operator’s own published windows, checked against its published terms and help pages. Where an operator publishes no window, we say “Varies” — we never fill the gap with a plausible-sounding number.
Methodology in practice
For example, LuckyCoin's bankroll of over $3M is published on-chain on Etherlink and can be checked by anyone on a public block explorer — so we treat it as a verifiable fact, not an operator claim taken on faith. What we can't confirm against a primary source, we mark as unverified.
Re-verification schedule
Bonus terms are re-checked roughly weekly. Payout rules, game counts and licence status are re-checked roughly monthly. A full review refresh happens whenever the operator's documents change.
We do not claim first-hand play testing. Reviews are built from the operator’s published documents, licence registers and other primary sources — facts we cannot verify from a primary source are marked as unverified or left out.